Factors affecting weed seed devitalization with the harrington seed destructor

Citation

Tidemann, B.D., Hall, L.M., Neil Harker, K., Beckie, H.J. (2017). Factors affecting weed seed devitalization with the harrington seed destructor. Weed Science, [online] 65(5), 650-658. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2017.23

Plain language summary

The Harrington Seed Destructor (HSD) is a new machine developed in Australia to manage weeds normally spread by combine harvesters. It has been highly effective in Australian cropping systems. To evaluate how it would work in western Canada it was operated unattached to a combine where a known number of weed seeds and a known amount of chaff was input into the machine to determine how many weed seeds were killed by the machine. Factors that were tested included weed species, weed seed size, weed seed number, chaff volume being processed, and chaff type (crop type) that the weed seeds were in. There was differences in control by weed species but control ranged from 97.7% to 99.8%. Various sizes of volunteer canola showed that control increased with larger seeds, however the difference in control between our smallest sized seed and our largest sized seed was less than 1%. High levels of weed seed kill was observed no matter how many weed seeds were processed at one time. Increasing chaff volume initially increased weed seed kill but eventually resulted in decline, however control was greater than 97% in all chaff volume treatments. There were differences in control based on chaff type (i.e. crop type), with a range between 98% and 98.6% weed seed kill. Overall the five factors studied did have some impacts on how well the HSD killed weeds, but the differences are likely too small to have much effect within a farmer's field. Overall the machine is quite effective at destroying seeds that make it into the machine and may be effective in producer fields in western Canada.

Abstract

The Harrington Seed Destructor (HSD), a novel weed control technology, has been highly effective in Australian cropping systems. To investigate its applicability to conditions in western Canada, stationary threshing was conducted to determine the impact of weed species, seed size, seed number, chaff load, and chaff type on efficacy of seed destruction. Control varied depending on species, with a range of 97.7% to 99.8%. Sieve-sized volunteer canola seed had a linear relationship of increasing control with increasing 1,000-seed weight. However, with greater than 98% control across all tested seed weights, it is unlikely that seed size alone will significantly influence control. Consistently high levels of control were observed at all tested seed densities (10 seeds to 1 million seeds). The response of weed seed control to chaff load was quadratic, but a narrow range of consistently high control (>97%) was again observed. Chaff type had a significant effect on weed seed control (98% to 98.6%); however, seed control values in canola chaff were likely confounded by a background presence of volunteer canola. Overall, the five parameters studied statistically influence control of weed seeds with the HSD. However, small differences between treatments are unlikely to affect the biological impact of the machine, which provides high levels of control for those weed seeds that can be introduced into the harvester. Nomenclature: Volunteer canola (rapeseed), Brassica napus L. BRSNN.

Publication date

2017-09-01

Author profiles