Postharvest quality implications of preharvest treatments applied to enhance ambrosia™ apple red blush colour at harvest

Citation

Toivonen, P.M.A., Lu, C., Stoochnoff, J. (2019). Postharvest quality implications of preharvest treatments applied to enhance ambrosia™ apple red blush colour at harvest. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, [online] 99(1), 40-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjps-2018-0193

Plain language summary

Two approaches for enhancing red blush color in Ambrosia™ apple were evaluated; 1) reflective row covers, or 2) application of foliar phosphorus-rich sprays, both applied several weeks before anticipated harvest. Two experiments were conducted, the first to evaluate a white reflective row cover versus foliar phosphorus spray and the second to evaluate two types of reflective row cover, one being made of a woven white polyethylene and the other a solid silvered Mylar®. The comparative effect these pre-harvest treatments on at-harvest fruit quality and quality after storage were assessed. It was determined that foliar phosphorus sprays or either of the two types of reflective row covers resulted in similar enhancement of red blush colour with no negative effects on at-harvest quality. However, it was found that after 8 months controlled atmosphere storage (1 % O2 + 1 % CO2 at 0.5 °C), apples from the phosphorus foliar spray treatment developed significant greasiness and sooty mold (blotch) on the skin surface, but neither were found on apples from the reflective row cover treatment. In the second experiment, after 5 months of air storage at 0.5 °C, the apples from the silvered Mylar® reflective row cover treatment developed severe storage-related disorders (soft scald and soggy breakdown) whereas apples from the white reflective row cover treatments very slight soft scald and no soggy breakdown. These results indicate that when pre-harvest treatments are applied to apples, that post-storage quality effects should be evaluated.

Abstract

Two approaches for enhancing red blush in Ambrosia™ apple were evaluated: (i) reflective row covers or (ii) application of foliar phosphorus-rich sprays, both applied several weeks before anticipated harvest. Two experiments were conducted, the first to evaluate a white reflective row cover versus foliar phosphorus spray, and the second to evaluateMylar®.two types of reflective row cover, one made of a woven white polyethylene sheet and the other a solid silvered The comparative effects of these preharvest treatments on at-harvest fruit quality and quality after storage were assessed in both experiments. It was determined that foliar phosphorus sprays or one of the two types of reflective row covers resulted in similar enhancement of red blush colour, with no negative effects on at-harvest quality. However, in the first experiment it was found that after 8 mo of controlled-atmosphere storage (1 kPa O 2 + 1 kPa CO 2 at 0.5 °C), apples from the phosphorus foliar spray treatment developed greasiness and sooty blotch compared with those from the reflective row coverMylar®or control treatments. In the second experiment, after 5 mo of air storage at 0.5 °C, the apples from the silvered reflective row cover treatment developed severe soft scald and soggy breakdown compared with the control and white reflective row cover treatments, which developed lower or very slight incidence of soft scald, respectively, and no soggy breakdown. These results indicate that when preharvest treatments are applied to apples, post-storage quality effects should be evaluated.

Publication date

2019-01-01

Author profiles