Estimating time-dependent vegetation biases in the SMAP soil moisture product
Citation
Zwieback, S., Colliander, A., Cosh, M.H., Martínez-Fernández, J., McNairn, H., Starks, P.J., Thibeault, M., Berg, A. (2018). Estimating time-dependent vegetation biases in the SMAP soil moisture product. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, [online] 22(8), 4473-4489. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-4473-2018
Plain language summary
The Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) satellite provides important information on surface and root zone soil moisture globally, every 2-3 days. However, the highest errors in these soil moisture products have been observed on annual cropped land, where vegetation growth is dynamic over time and space. Proper characterization of this vegetation cover is important in retrieving accurate estimates of soil moisture from NASA’s SMAP satellite. This research introduces a Bayesian extension to triple collocation such that systematic errors and noise terms are not constant but are allowed to vary. These time-variable offsets and sensitivities were found to be commonly associated with an imperfect vegetation correction. Changes in sensitivity can be large, with seasonal variations of up to 40 %. Variations of this size would impede the seasonal comparison of soil moisture dynamics and the detection of extreme soil moisture events. This research highlights that time-variable biases can easily give rise to distorted estimates of soil moisture. As such, these results must be accounted for in observational and modelling studies that use the SMAP soil moisture products.
Abstract
Remotely sensed soil moisture products are influenced by vegetation and how it is accounted for in the retrieval, which is a potential source of time-variable biases. To estimate such complex, time-variable error structures from noisy data, we introduce a Bayesian extension to triple collocation in which the systematic errors and noise terms are not constant but vary with explanatory variables. We apply the technique to the Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) soil moisture product over croplands, hypothesizing that errors in the vegetation correction during the retrieval leave a characteristic fingerprint in the soil moisture time series. We find that time-variable offsets and sensitivities are commonly associated with an imperfect vegetation correction. Especially the changes in sensitivity can be large, with seasonal variations of up to 40 %. Variations of this size impede the seasonal comparison of soil moisture dynamics and the detection of extreme events. Also, estimates of vegetation-hydrology coupling can be distorted, as the SMAP soil moisture has larger <i>R</i>2 values with a biomass proxy than the in situ data, whereas noise alone would induce the opposite effect. This observation highlights that time-variable biases can easily give rise to distorted results and misleading interpretations. They should hence be accounted for in observational and modelling studies.